10 November 2010

U.S. climate blame game: My two cents

Since the election (and even before), pundits have been lining up (here, here, and here) trying to figure out why the heck the U.S. Congress couldn't pass a climate bill this year. Potential culprits include the Republicans, the Tea Party, Rahm Emanuel, the media, environmental groups, the public, the fossil fuel industry, Harry Reid, Senate Democrats, the filibuster, the Senate itself, Barack Obama, etc., etc., etc.

I think it's easy and stupid to blame the Republicans. Yes, the party has become deranged since the 2008 election, and the fact that denial of climate change has become party dogma even for those who know better is very disturbing. But if a child misbehaves, do you blame the child or the adults who should know better? If you lose a football game, do you blame the other team or you own bad playing?

Democrats in the Senate didn't even bring the climate bill passed in the House to a vote. That's their fault. If they had put up a fight and lost, that would be one thing. Not even showing up is another. Now, Obama never convinced me of his golden touch, but his popularity in 2008 was due to people's belief that he had a strong vision for the country and was passionate enough to take us there. Where is his vision on climate change?? His administration is directly culpable: it sabotaged Senate efforts at several turns. But the president has been eerily silent on climate and his messaging is pathetic:
And I think one of the things that's very important for me is not to have us ignore the science, but rather to find ways that we can solve these problems that don't hurt the economy, that encourage the development of clean energy in this country, that, in fact, may give us opportunities to create entire new industries and create jobs that - and that put us in a competitive posture around the world.
Setting up climate action as "not bad for the economy" is counterproductive. It retains "economic growth" as the most important value for Americans and sets up a requirement that mitigation measures not touch that growth. It's also easy to show that any policy that could mitigate emissions might slow economic growth, setting it up for failure.

So, to recap: Democrats, own up to your share of the blame, especially you, Obama. You're supposed to be a leader. While you're at it, start selling climate policy on its own merits rather than qualifying it and dooming it to unattainable standards.

No comments: